
Originally Posted by
John Gilmour
Ride with high stance angles ... even 40-48 front and 35+ rear is ok.
Please don't.
Maybe this is why John feel like freeride boards have no nose and tail support? (If you could hear my tone, it would be respectful, with not a bit of smartassedness to it)
Lower angles will allow the board to ride as designed, not like a weaker alpine board. Soft boots are designed to apply soft pressure tip to tail through their soft lateral design, Edge to edge, you'll be more powerful with your feet perpendicular to the edge, using the foot in it's most natural and supported position for accepting and applying edge pressure.
I do like the offset tech (Gilmour Bias? Uuhhh...) but agree that binding out on heelsides is a problem. I hard-mounted my highbacks with the strap mounts and completely removed the heel loop from my C14's , purchased on ebay, because there was enough material to allow this. Low angles and no overhang.
Try this: About 20 - 30 degrees on the front. I have since lowered my front foot angle after many years of riding a higher angle. When I ride bindingless, I found my front foot backing off to a point where it naturally located itself in a position that would bias pressure control edge to edge, but with enough forward angle to still have my toes involved in tip to tail pressure control. Higher and I would be pressuring the nose and tail too much when foot steering, exposing the softer than normal flex of this type of board. Lower would result in good edge to edge pressure but very little tip to tail pressure control as I'd be on the side of my foot.
Back foot? I do ride a bit duck. -3. This allows a very low position (try squatting with your back foot at 35... Now try it at something a bit negative). It also allows you to apply a ton of pressure with what John suggested by rotating your back knee out and away from your front as you go through the toe turn , while shifting pressure to the toe of your back foot.
Admittedly, heelside posture can become an issue if you try to turn in a freecarve style, angulating your hips too much, heelside or toeside, (especially heelside) with these angles. The alpine technique favours edge angle over pressure control simply because in that forward-rotated body position you can tip it over that much. Since you can't edge (angle) as much heelside as toeside in this lower angle configuration, you have to rely on pressure between the feet and solid posture to turn. Edge (angle) less and pressure more effectively by staying more in alignment with your bindings, especially towards the last 3rd of the turn, in the hips and advancing the board under your mass with your core, legs and feet. Front foot to start, both feet through the apex and back foot to complete.
The more forward the stance, the more mechanically similar the physicality of your posture will be. Low angles require 2 completely different techniques from one side to the other. Get into it. It is true that these boards do not carve as well as alpine boards, so don't try to make a alpine board out of a freeride deck. Flatten your angles, carve less hard and enjoy the advantages that will open up to you in the style the equipment was intended for.