WinterGold
February 17th, 2010, 05:44 AM
I have been riding a Kessler KST SL 162 a lot this season and I was surprised how good an allrounder this board actually is. I read BlueBīs report of his narrow BX 168 and thought that this must be an excellent allrounder.
And I remember that some people here kept complaining about the small radii of most boards built for softboots (e.g. Jack, if I remember correctly).
But the new SBX boards seem to have everything - Oxess is building a 163 with either 12m or 14.5m radius. And for 2011 SG will have a completely new SBX board which is 165 and also has 14.5m radius. The boards are wide enough for middle sized boots (around 26cm waist) and they have all the features from the modern race shapes - low decambered nose and tail, taper, etc. All these elements make them perfect for a great variety of conditions. And they also seem to work quite well with hardboots.
So they must be THE new "having-fun-in-almost-all-conditions" boards. Or do I miss something here?
One interesting thing - is it correct that all (or most) of the black Oxess boards donīt have metal in them? The 2011 SG will not have a metal construction (like this year) and it seems that some (many?) riders prefer this construction for SBX. Only the white Oxess are titanal and there werenīt that many in the Olympics, right?
By the way, the running length of the new SG 165 is 15cm (!!!) longer than the SG 167 from this year - thatīs amazing!
I wouldnīt trade in my dedicated race boards, but as an addition Iīm really tempted at the moment to get a BX board :D ...
And I remember that some people here kept complaining about the small radii of most boards built for softboots (e.g. Jack, if I remember correctly).
But the new SBX boards seem to have everything - Oxess is building a 163 with either 12m or 14.5m radius. And for 2011 SG will have a completely new SBX board which is 165 and also has 14.5m radius. The boards are wide enough for middle sized boots (around 26cm waist) and they have all the features from the modern race shapes - low decambered nose and tail, taper, etc. All these elements make them perfect for a great variety of conditions. And they also seem to work quite well with hardboots.
So they must be THE new "having-fun-in-almost-all-conditions" boards. Or do I miss something here?
One interesting thing - is it correct that all (or most) of the black Oxess boards donīt have metal in them? The 2011 SG will not have a metal construction (like this year) and it seems that some (many?) riders prefer this construction for SBX. Only the white Oxess are titanal and there werenīt that many in the Olympics, right?
By the way, the running length of the new SG 165 is 15cm (!!!) longer than the SG 167 from this year - thatīs amazing!
I wouldnīt trade in my dedicated race boards, but as an addition Iīm really tempted at the moment to get a BX board :D ...