View Full Version : 21.5 wide riders
Bobby Buggs
January 9th, 2009, 02:33 PM
This is the widest board I have ever had:eek:
Just wondering where you have your angles
fishrising
January 9th, 2009, 02:40 PM
Mr. Evil, I'll check my Donek Oppenheim FC 179cm x 21cm x 11.2m and my Rad-Air Tanker Over Size 187cm x 25.8cm x 9m . But a lot my depend your boot size. I riding 31.5s, so my numbers may be way different than yours.
James Ong
January 9th, 2009, 02:41 PM
Fwiw on my 23 cm wide board i'm running 55/50
size 27 boots
Bobby Buggs
January 9th, 2009, 02:51 PM
Mr. Evil, I'll check my Donek Oppenheim FC 179cm x 21cm x 11.2m and my Rad-Air Tanker Over Size 187cm x 25.8cm x 9m . But a lot my depend your boot size. I riding 31.5s, so my numbers may be way different than yours.
Thanks Ben, yeah I dont have Monster Feet:D
Im going to run at 57x52 to start
Bobby Buggs
January 9th, 2009, 03:04 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uw8myMwrVF4 Shot with my Blackberry Curve, sorry for the low res
Mike Tokar
January 9th, 2009, 03:17 PM
on a 21.5 wide Coiler AM 177, size 10.5 feet.
Loc
January 9th, 2009, 03:37 PM
I ride on a Prior ATV 171 with 55f/50r on my MP24. It's waist is 23.5cm I think.
Bullwings
January 9th, 2009, 06:56 PM
I ride on a Prior ATV 171 with 55f/50r on my MP24. It's waist is 23.5cm I think.
Wow, i have MP 28.5 feet and i ran those angles (55/52) on my 161 ATV. and yes, it is a 23.5 cm waist.
When i had a 4wd - 21.5 waist, i was running 60/57. that board was awesome. too bad i was an idiot and stuffed the nose into a mogul and broke it in half.
mnovak
January 9th, 2009, 08:18 PM
52/45 on prior 4wd with 21.4 waist. Just fits with 26.5Mondo boots.
Thor VonRippington
January 9th, 2009, 09:41 PM
Riding a couple different 21 wides at 60/57 with a 28 mondo
but thats "relaxed" compared to the others
KingCrimson
January 9th, 2009, 10:44 PM
I ride on a Prior ATV 171 with 55f/50r on my MP24. It's waist is 23.5cm I think.
Blessed with carving feet.. How far are your toes and heels from the edges?
NateW
January 10th, 2009, 12:01 AM
50/55 with size-27 Raichles
Loc
January 10th, 2009, 12:28 AM
Blessed with carving feet.. How far are your toes and heels from the edges?
I just checked it out and it's about 2cm from the edges. I can go down to 30* angles but I've been incrementing my angles gradually so I can eventually ride skinnier boards like the Madd.
Steph
January 10th, 2009, 06:15 AM
Hey Bob my Coiler AM is 21.5 and I ride 52f/47r. On the wider board I need to have my weight distributed more towards the edges, so lower angles work better for me.
Fleaman
January 10th, 2009, 06:57 AM
I have a 21 and a 23 wide board with 30mp boots.
I have 65 and 58 on the 21
i ride 60 and 48 on the 23
KingCrimson
January 10th, 2009, 09:33 AM
I just checked it out and it's about 2cm from the edges. I can go down to 30* angles but I've been incrementing my angles gradually so I can eventually ride skinnier boards like the Madd.
That makes sense, I was curious, mainly for the reason Steph mentioned.
BadBrad
January 10th, 2009, 10:05 AM
52/45 on prior 4wd with 21.4 waist. Just fits with 26.5Mondo boots.
On my 4WD and with 26.5 boots I am at 54/51.
b0ardski
January 10th, 2009, 11:35 AM
I ride the 165 Nidecker Escape at 35r/47f. however the back foot will bootout if I lay out ec carves. great for all around bumps, trees, & offpiste.:biggthump
This is with low profile Nitro plates right to the edge.
mark pinch
January 11th, 2009, 10:57 PM
It's 21.5; size 10 boots; I run twin 45's!
D-Sub
January 11th, 2009, 11:25 PM
I don't understand the question...every single board I've ever had I set my boots right at hee;/toe ie to the edes. narrow board higher angles, wide board lower angles, but toes and heels at the edges, or slightly under.
Is the intent here to keep the same angles from board to board? That seems counterintuitive to me.
oh, and just so Im actually answering...my 23cm prior has me at 47/50 with a mondo 27
Jack Michaud
January 12th, 2009, 04:53 AM
Basically what D-Sub said. My board is 21cm wide, and I just put toes and heels on the edges with no overhang looking down from above. These are the lowest angles I've ridden since my last 21cm board (13 years ago :eek:), and I'm loving it. Feels like a snowboard again! I like the extra ankle leverage while carving - it's more stable and balanced. And while not carving it's a lot more natural and fun. There's a reason racers went to wider boards.
D-Sub
January 12th, 2009, 10:41 AM
Basically what D-Sub said. My board is 21cm wide, and I just put toes and heels on the edges with no overhang looking down from above. These are the lowest angles I've ridden since my last 21cm board, and I'm loving it. Feels like a snowboard again! I like the extra ankle leverage while carving - it's more stable and balanced. And while not carving it's a lot more natural and fun. There's a reason racers went to wider boards.
My prior is 19.5...Id like to try a 20 or 21cm waisted carver. The all mountain I have is 23.5 and I can still edge to edge it pretty fast. I like that board.
Just seems logical to set the angles toes on the toe edge and heels on the heel edge.
I know Sutherland rides the same angles no matter which board and I always thought it was weird, but you sure can't question his skills.
Neil Gendzwill
January 12th, 2009, 11:11 AM
45 f, 40 r with mondo 27.5 Raichles on my 21.5 waisted AM. There's no issue with drag, and it's a super-functional stance for me for all-mountain riding.
http://www.kendo-sask.com/misc/Sunshine.JPG.
Jack Michaud
January 12th, 2009, 11:21 AM
45 f, 40 r with mondo 27.5 Raichles on my 21.5 waisted AM. There's no issue with drag,
BS flag thrown! ;)
I have 28.0 boots and a 21cm board. I have to be at ~58 to eliminate overhang when viewed from above. Are you saying you have overhang but it doesn't cause an issue? Cuz I can't imagine you don't have overhang.
Neil Gendzwill
January 12th, 2009, 11:28 AM
I can set the boots in the bindings and roll the whole setup over 90 degrees on carpet, no problem. I don't recall if you can see overhang from above, looking at that picture maybe you do but by the time you get the binding risers and the shape of the toe and heel working together it works fine from a practical standpoint. Maybe there might be some issue on soft snow doing EC stuff, I don't know. No grief for the sort of riding I do.
That pictures from when I got together with Gtanner and Fleaman at Sunshine, we all were rocking the AMs that weekend. They run steeper angles than me, IIRC Gord said he just kept the same angles from his narrower boards.
Mike T
January 12th, 2009, 12:10 PM
50/48, Size 25 Track 700s, F2 Race Ti Standards, using about 1cm of Gilmour Bias. The heel in front and toe in back would each cast a couple mm of shadow on the ground if a light was shined on the rig from above but I don't recall ever booting out.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.