View Full Version : Edge Bevels
NateW
February 18th, 2008, 01:00 AM
I have been riding with 1 degree base and side bevels for ~10 years and just had one of my boards done with 1.5 & 2 degree bevels. I've only got a few runs on that board so far, but I am leaning toward doing that to my other boards.
Mostly I was looking to make the board feel more neutral (less catchy / hooky) when riding fast with the base flat... I got what I wanted, but I also feel like it might be a little too neutral. I was surprised how much difference an extra 0.5 degree makes.
So I'm curious, what bevels does everyone else use, and why?
Thanks!
dshack
February 18th, 2008, 01:37 AM
1 base/2 side, no idea why. If someone gave me a good reason to change, I probably would. I ride a madd 170 on groomers, ice, slush, pow.
redriver
February 18th, 2008, 06:11 AM
... but I've noticed that my board also "wants to turn" when I'm riding neutral at high speeds, often on flat, green zones. Feels like it wants to grab an edge in the rear and spooks me a bit.
Wonder now if another .5 degree on the base bevel (it's 1.0 now) would solve it. Anyone else know for sure?
pebu
February 18th, 2008, 06:34 AM
I ride one to make it less grabby, but going over that means you have to put it up on edge farther to get it to grab. I've never tried it with less so I don't know any different than 1, but it sure seems like a good all around number. Racers maybe want a little less for faster edge changes. Riders on alot of cat tracks might like a little more for less grabbiness.
Pow
February 18th, 2008, 07:19 AM
1 degree base, two degree side. I first rode 0/0 way back in the day, then 1/1 and thought it was so much better, now I use 1/2 and it really helps hold onto the ice (but poor technique will still make you lose your grip:o)
kmartshopper
February 18th, 2008, 07:27 AM
I've been riding my Donek FCII at the delivered 0 bevel cuz I am hard-core :angryfire
Actually - my theory is that you can get more life out of the board between grinds, because when the edges get skuffed up enough, I can file to a 0.5deg, then 1deg and get nice edges each time without touching the base. It seems to me that regardless of your bevel, once you've filed the edges higher than the base, you're going to end up with an effective bevel with regards to grabbiness - then you'll need a grind.
I do tend to transition back and forth between edges on flats though - probably because subconsciously I know I'm asking for it.
I have an old rock board (softies) that I like riding in bumps that I call 'the spoon' which must have 5deg or more of free-hand file beveling. Very swooshy and fun in soft snow.
________
Lovely Wendie99 (http://www.lovelywendie99.com/)
Jack Michaud
February 18th, 2008, 07:36 AM
gives me 1 base, 3 side. yes, three. it's killer.
Mike T
February 18th, 2008, 08:06 AM
1 base - because with less, I seem to get edge engagement when I didn't intend it.
3 side - more positive edge engagement on those early-morning, springtime frozen groomers.
I too first experienced 3/1 on a PTC tune and loved it. I mostly do my own edge tuning and starting doing my boards as such and while I don't get the same degree opf polish as with PTC, I've gotten pretty good at it if I do say so myself :)
SEJ
February 18th, 2008, 12:56 PM
Went from 1-1 to 1-2 and like it better. Just got a 3* guide, so we'll see what a 1-3 feels like. I don't mind the slightly higher maintainence the sharper edges require.
bobdea
February 18th, 2008, 01:13 PM
1 base 3 side becausr PTC says so and Mike's tunes are the best I've been on
Fastskiguy
February 18th, 2008, 05:51 PM
When I bought my Donek one of the guys said he rides his with a 1 base and 2 side bevel. So I tuned mine that way. Seems to be a little more forgiving than the 0 base bevel that they came with.
skidad62
February 18th, 2008, 06:10 PM
gives me 1 base, 3 side. yes, three. it's killer.
x2 - i run the same 1 /3 bevel
bumpyride
February 18th, 2008, 06:25 PM
Base goes to the end of the pads on my fingertips underneath the file and the side bevel is 2.
I'm almost always in the air or on edge, so I don't usually worry about riding flat.
Shred Gruumer
February 18th, 2008, 06:42 PM
I DO TELL!..
flat base....(less work to maitain if I need a belt hit or stone grind structure) then 3 on the side... Lets face it... its icy out here!! ha..:smashfrea
Anything else feels like it will break loose.. oh and none of that sissy detune the edges.. are you kidding me.. After all that I have done to give me the most effective edge... the hell if im going to dull it... tip to tail razor sharp!...!! if it sticks in turns I'll just pop it out. thats the least of my worries.. edge ice.,,,edge ice...
Thats it...
ARCrider
February 18th, 2008, 11:04 PM
0.5 base
3.0 edge
cuts like a six foot knife.
dirk109
February 19th, 2008, 06:26 AM
Here we go again with the PTC Love Fest!!!
Sinecure
February 19th, 2008, 09:43 AM
The poll is flawed. How do I vote. Are you just asking about base bevel, or side bevel too?
1 base
2 side
Bobby Buggs
February 19th, 2008, 11:30 AM
Here we go again with the PTC Love Fest!!!
Hahahahahaaaaa, heard the same PTC tunes can be done at the Starting gate. Any truth to this??????
AlexJ
February 19th, 2008, 01:12 PM
Well to start I have used 1deg base and 3 deg edge.
I have used this on all of my boards for probably 7 or 8 years on the recommendation of the Starting Gate.
Second to answer Buggs question, in my opinion the answer is yes. I have ridden both tunes and feel that the gate tune is 100% equal to the PTC tune.
True I have never let PTC touch one of my boards but I have never felt the need to jump on the hype and try a different tuner. The gate tuned my boards when I was racing and they always performed top notch.
Not bashing PTC in anyway they do produce a top notch tune arguably one of the best in the country, just saying that there are others out there in the same league with similar credentials.
Alex
wavechaser
February 21st, 2008, 08:52 AM
1base - 3 side for SL (effective 88 degree angle)
.5 base - 3 side for GS (effective 87.5 degree angle)
A little more edge-to-edge quickness on the SL board due to the base bevel, and the 88 degree angle works fine because the SL board is only on the edge for such a short time. A little more control riding flat on the GS ride, and also a little more edge angle for hold on the hard stuff.
As per PTC's suggestions - I don't really file down my base edges at all between grinds, as that would mean either the bevel increases, or the edge becomes lower than the base, neither of which I want. i just diamond stone the base edges lightly, and use a Ray's Way bevel tool on the side edges...unless there is significant edge damage.
big canuck
February 21st, 2008, 09:20 AM
a simple drawing of these "bevels" we're speaking of. I'm sure my local shop could show me but if someone here has the Skillz to draw it out or show a link that shows what you're talking about I'd appreciate getting this topic dummed down a bit. Thanks.
K
Pow
February 21st, 2008, 09:34 AM
<CENTER><TABLE cellPadding=4 width=600 border=1><TBODY><TR><TD width=350 height=400>http://www.alpinecarving.com/images/tune_angles.gif</TD><TD width=289>This cut-away side view of a snowboard edge shows the base and edge angles. The base edge angle is the angle between the base and the surface of the base edge metal. The side edge angle (measured relative to the vertical) is the angle between the vertical and the surface of the side edge metal. </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER>
would this image from the carver's almanac do?
tex1230
February 21st, 2008, 09:56 AM
Hahahahahaaaaa, heard the same PTC tunes can be done at the Starting gate. Any truth to this??????
I have ridden both tunes and feel that the gate tune is 100% equal to the PTC tune.
True I have never let PTC touch one of my boards but I have never felt the need to jump on the hype and try a different tuner. The gate tuned my boards when I was racing and they always performed top notch.
Not bashing PTC in anyway they do produce a top notch tune arguably one of the best in the country, just saying that there are others out there in the same league with similar credentials.
Alex
Startingate tunes rule!
(really - I haven't tried PTC but the tunes I get at the Gate are equal or better than the race tech guys gave me when I was out in California - and that was when the tune really mattered.)
1/3 (as suggested by Shawn)
had been riding 1/1 for as long as I can remember - I can feel the difference in a more definite edge set on ice.
big canuck
February 21st, 2008, 10:04 AM
Pow. :smashfrea:biggthump
kmartshopper
February 21st, 2008, 04:07 PM
As per PTC's suggestions - I don't really file down my base edges at all between grinds, as that would mean either the bevel increases, or the edge becomes lower than the base, neither of which I want. i just diamond stone the base edges lightly, and use a Ray's Way bevel tool on the side edges...unless there is significant edge damage.
I definitely agree with this theory. Filing base edges will screw with the 'effective' bevel. If we're haggling over 1/2deg increments - then you can bet your butt that raising the edge with respect to the base via filing will have a very noticeable impact - regardless of bevel angle. That's why if you are really-really-really cheezy and want your boards to last forever, you could start with a 0deg base, then after some time when the edges get chewed up a bit, you could file to a 1/2 get nice clean edges without having to get reground. Repeat @1deg. As long as you do it right, this won't affect the relative height of the edge w/r to the base.... it will be like a fresh tune @that base bevel.
BTW, I always mark my edges with a sharpie before I file so I am sure I'm getting it right - and so I stop when I've gone far enough.
I know... it will ride differently, but in the interests of squeezing every last penny out of your wallet and making the board last forever... it's not a bad bet.
________
Zx14 vs hayabusa (http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Which_bike_is_quicker_kawasaki_zx_-14_or_suzuki_hayabusa)
Slim
February 21st, 2008, 04:48 PM
1base - 3 side for SL (effective 88 degree angle)
.5 base - 3 side for GS (effective 87.5 degree angle)
...A little more edge-to-edge quickness on the SL board due to the base bevel...Wouldn't less base edge bevel result in faster edge-to-edge transitions? It would seem a larger angle would require larger movements, and thus take more time.
wavechaser
February 21st, 2008, 05:05 PM
Wouldn't less base edge bevel result in faster edge-to-edge transitions? It would seem a larger angle would require larger movements, and thus take more time.
The change in distance or movement, and any change in time required to perform it, is extremely minimal when we're talking about half degree differences in base edge bevel. The difference is, with a little more base bevel, a board will FEEL "looser" and easier to commit to a turn, AND easier to get out of a turn - thus quicker edge-to-edge. It's a handling thing, not a time and distance thing.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.